Report Finds Low-Income Hispanics in
South Targeted for Abuse,
Discrimination
MONTGOMERY, Alabama (The Southern
Poverty Law Center) April 23, 2009 ―
Low-income Hispanic immigrants in
the South are routinely the targets
of wage theft, racial profiling and
other abuses driven by an
anti-immigrant climate that harms
all Hispanics regardless of their
immigration status, according to a
report released today by the
Southern Poverty Law Center.
The report —
Under Siege: Life for Low-Income
Hispanics in the South — documents
the experiences of Hispanic immigrants
who face increasing hostility as they
fill low-wage jobs in Southern states
that had few Hispanic residents until
recent years.
"This report documents the human toll of
failed policies that relegate millions
of people to an underground economy,
where they are beyond the protection of
the law," said Mary Bauer, author of the
report and director of the SPLC's
Immigrant Justice Project. "Workplace
abuses and racial profiling are rampant
in the South."
Under Siege is based on a survey of 500
low-income Hispanics — including legal
residents, undocumented immigrants and
U.S. citizens — at five locations in the
South. The locations were Nashville,
Charlotte, New Orleans, rural southern
Georgia, and several towns and cities in
northern Alabama.
The survey findings, coupled with
accounts from in-depth interviews,
depict a region where Hispanics are
routinely cheated out of wages by
employers and denied basic health and
safety protections. They are racially
profiled by overzealous law enforcement
agents and victimized by criminals who
know they are reluctant to report crime
to these same authorities. Even legal
residents and U.S. citizens of Hispanic
descent said racial profiling, bigotry
and other forms of discrimination are
staples of their daily lives.
A number of immigrants in the survey
described the South as a "war zone."
"The assumption is that every Hispanic
possibly is undocumented," Angeles
Ortega-Moore, an immigrant advocate in
North Carolina, told SPLC researchers.
"So it [discrimination] has spread over
into the legal population."
Maria, who came to Tennessee from
Colombia, told SPLC researchers her
immigration papers are in order, but she
is still afraid of being stopped by the
police. "You never know when you will
come across a racist police officer,"
she says in the report.
Discrimination against Hispanics in the
region constitutes a civil rights crisis
that must be addressed, the SPLC report
says. The report concludes that
comprehensive immigration reform —
including a workable path to citizenship
for undocumented immigrants — is the
only realistic, fair and humane
solution.
Reform legislation must be coupled with
strong enforcement of labor and civil
rights protections. This would make
crime victims and communities safer,
curb racial profiling and other abuses,
and better protect the wages and working
conditions of all workers, according to
the report.
"We're talking about a matter of basic
human rights here," said SPLC President
Richard Cohen. "By allowing this cycle
of abuse and discrimination to continue,
we're creating an underclass of people
who are invisible to justice and
undermining our country's fundamental
ideals."Immigration Law: There is No
"Line"
It's a refrain often repeated on talk
radio and TV talk shows when immigration
is debated: Why don't they just get in
line to become legal?
As one Hispanic interviewed for this
report noted, "They don't understand
that it's not that easy." In fact, for
many people in the United States —
including undocumented immigrants —
there is no line.
Immigration law is enormously complex,
with dozens of potential immigration
statuses. Currently, there are four
major ways a person can obtain a green
card for lawful permanent residency:
•
A specified family relationship with a
U.S. citizen or legal permanent
resident.
•
An employer petition for lawful
permanent residency.
•
Adjustment from refugee or asylee
status.
•
Obtaining a diversity visa, a process
commonly known as "the lottery."
Most undocumented immigrants in the U.S.
find none of these options are available
to them.
Family Relationships and the "Anchor
Baby" Myth
Despite the widespread myth of the
"anchor baby" born to undocumented
immigrants who use a child to quickly
gain citizenship, the law does not allow
such a path. Children born in the United
States cannot petition for the permanent
residency of their parents until age 21.
Further, there is no data supporting the
theory that families have babies as part
of a 21-year plan to achieve
citizenship. In fact, absent changes to
U.S. law, the parents would likely be
ineligible to migrate to the United
States.
The other family relationships specified
as a path to lawful permanent residency
include spouses, parents and siblings.
The process of gaining residency status
through a family relationship can take
more than 20 years. Some of these family
relationship categories are so
backlogged with immigrants seeking legal
permanent resident status that federal
officials have declared those categories
unavailable. Immigrants who don't have
these relationships will find that this
path to citizenship is non-existent.
Employer Petition
Employment-based visas are not available
to most low-income workers, even for the
most exemplary employees. Of the more
than 1 million legal permanent resident
visas given out each year, only 10,000
are allocated for workers who are not
highly educated or trained. There are so
many individuals waiting for these
visas, the category has been designated
as unavailable by immigration officials.
Refugee/Asylee Status
Refugee or asylee status is a rare
commodity for Mexican or Central
American residents. Few people from
these areas have been granted either
status in recent years. In order to
qualify, individuals must face a
"well-founded fear of persecution on
account of race, religion, nationality,
membership in a particular social group,
or political opinion." Asylum is not an
option for those seeking to escape
crushing poverty.
"The Lottery"
The odds are long in the diversity visa
"lottery." In this lottery, about 50,000
visas are awarded each year to eligible
individuals. Yet more than 6 million
people from around the world applied in
2007. Individuals from Mexico and most
Central American countries are flatly
ineligible for these visas because they
are reserved for countries with small
numbers of immigrants to the United
States.
A Painful Choice
Even for people otherwise eligible to
become permanent residents — such as
those married to a U.S. citizen — recent
changes to immigration law make it
impossible for many of them to adjust
their status.
From 1994 until 2001, Section 245(i) of
the Immigration and Nationality Act
allowed certain individuals who were
otherwise eligible for immigrant visas,
but entered the United States without
inspection or fell out of lawful status,
to become lawful permanent residents
without traveling to a U.S. consulate
outside the country to obtain this
status.
Section 245(i) grew in significance
after 1996, when Congress enacted a law
with a provision known as the "3 and 10
year bars." Under this provision, an
immigrant who is unlawfully in the
United States for more than 180 days and
then leaves the country is barred from
re-entry for three or 10 years. The
length of the re-entry ban depends on
the length of the illegal stay.
Until 2001, Section 245(i) provided a
path to legal permanent residence that
didn't require eligible aliens to leave
the country — a requirement that would
subject them to the re-entry ban.
Because of more recent changes to
immigration law, however, countless
people who are otherwise eligible to
adjust their status — including
thousands of people married to U.S.
citizens — are subject to that ban.
Many people now face the painful choice
of either leaving the country and their
family for 10 years for the chance to
become a legal permanent resident or
remaining in the United States with
their family and giving up the hope of
ever achieving legal status.