BAINBRIDGE ISLAND, WA
(By Daina Saib Purple America) Fall 2008 — Single-payer national
health insurance is a system in which a single public or
quasi-public agency organizes health financing, but delivery of care
remains largely private.
Currently, the U.S.
health care system is outrageously expensive, yet inadequate.
Despite spending more than twice as much as the rest of the
industrialized nations ($7,129 per capita), the United States
performs poorly in comparison on major health indicators such as
life expectancy, infant mortality and immunization rates. Moreover,
the other advanced nations provide comprehensive coverage to their
entire populations, while the U.S. leaves 47 million completely
uninsured and millions more inadequately covered.
The reason we spend
more and get less than the rest of the world is because we have a
patchwork system of for-profit payers. Private insurers necessarily
waste health dollars on things that have nothing to do with care:
overhead, underwriting, billing, sales and marketing departments as
well as huge profits and exorbitant executive pay. Doctors and
hospitals must maintain costly administrative staffs to deal with
the bureaucracy. Combined, this needless administration consumes
one-third (31 percent) of Americans’ health dollars.
Single-payer financing
is the only way to recapture this wasted money. The potential
savings on paperwork, more than $350 billion per year, are enough to
provide comprehensive coverage to everyone without paying any more
than we already do.
Under a single-payer
system, all Americans would be covered for all medically necessary
services, including: doctor, hospital, long-term care, mental
health, dental, vision, prescription drug and medical supply costs.
Patients would regain free choice of doctor and hospital, and
doctors would regain autonomy over patient care.
Physicians would be
paid fee-for-service according to a negotiated formulary or receive
salary from a hospital or nonprofit HMO / group practice. Hospitals
would receive a global budget for operating expenses. Health
facilities and expensive equipment purchases would be managed by
regional health planning boards.
A single-payer system
would be financed by eliminating private insurers and recapturing
their administrative waste. Modest new taxes would replace premiums
and out-of-pocket payments currently paid by individuals and
business. Costs would be controlled through negotiated fees, global
budgeting and bulk purchasing.
Single Payer Health
Insurance
Dr. Rocky White, a former Republican, has become a leading advocate
of single-payer, national health insurance.
You wouldn’t know it from the candidates’ debates or reports on the
major television networks, but a majority of Americans favor a
government-run health insurance system similar to Canada’s.
Those lining up to support single-payer health care include medical
professionals, business people, and many Republicans. Dr. Rocky
White has been all of those things.
White is a former Republican, from a conservative, evangelical
background, who got interested in health care reform nine years ago
when his own medical practice slipped into the red. His research
into the health care system led him to conclude that the problem
wasn’t just in his practice— the health care system itself is
broken, and a single-payer program is the most efficient way to fix
it.
Under the single-payer system, doctors’ offices and hospitals remain
private for-profit or non-profit institutions. But the federal
government covers the bills for patient services, with funds coming
from taxes. The patient gets the health care they need. Paperwork
and billing are kept to a minimum. Employers no longer have the
difficult task of choosing, administering, and paying for health
insurance for employees. Everyone is covered.
The current setup is as complicated as single-payer is simple.
Today, the discerning consumer must wade through a complex system of
pre-existing condition exemptions, co-pays, and deductibles—if they
have coverage at all. Arguments over billing among doctors’ offices,
insurance companies, patients, and their lawyers eat up millions of
dollars. An estimated $25 out of each $100 spent goes to paperwork,
profits, and executive pay and bonuses. And disagreement over
medical coverage is one of the most common sources of labor disputes
for employers who have seen insurance premiums double since 2000.
With these inflated costs, it’s little wonder that in 2006, the last
year for which government figures are available, 47 million
Americans had no insurance at all, including 8.7 million children,
or that 68 percent of bankruptcies in the U.S. come as a direct
result of medical expenses among people who do have insurance.
A CNN/Opinion Research Poll last year showed 64% of Americans would
be willing to pay higher taxes for a national health care system.
When White learned about Physicians for a National Health Program
and their plan for a single-payer health care system, he saw it was
similar to his own idea and he joined their effort.
Other medical professionals have had a similar reaction. The
American College of Physicians—the largest organization of medical
specialists in the country—endorses single-payer health care as does
the California Nurses Association, the largest organization of
registered nurses.
And so do 55 percent of Americans, according to a CBS News poll
conducted in September. In another poll, 64 percent said they would
be willing to pay higher taxes for a national health care insurance
program.
In Congress, HR 676, the “Medicare for All” bill introduced by
Representative John Conyers, Jr. of Michigan, currently has 90
co-sponsors—more than any other health care reform proposal—and the
endorsement of the U.S. Conference of Mayors.
Republicans for Single-Payer
Support for single-payer
health care is not just strong among progressives. George Swan, for
instance, is a health care administrator, self-described “Purple
Republican,” and a founder of Republicans for Single Payer.
“It’s about being American and doing what’s right,” Swan says.
“What’s right is not paying a 30 percent premium to the insurance
system and receiving sub-standard health care.”
Business owners are also supporting single-payer health care. For 25
years, Jack Lohman owned a company that provided cardiac monitoring
services to hospitals. Today, he’s a co-founder of the Business
Coalition for Single Payer. A “lifelong Republican,” Lohman argues
that conservatives should support single-payer because it’s
pro-business.
“For the same 16 percent of GDP that we are spending on health care
in the U.S.,” he says, “we could provide first-class health care to
100 percent of the people.” And single-payer would “get health care
off the backs of corporations so they can be more competitive with
products made overseas.”
John Arensmeyer spent 12 years running an e-commerce company with 35
employees. Then he founded the Small Business Majority to advocate
for the interests of small businesses, particularly on health care
issues. Sharp rises in health care costs for small businesses are
hurting their ability to survive, Arensmeyer says. “It’s
antithetical to what we’re all about as a country, which is to allow
people the freedom to go out and start new enterprises.”
Small business has often been portrayed as opposing health care
reform, but SBM’s research shows that small businesses are
interested in being part of the solution—even if it means paying
higher taxes.
Walter Maher, former vice-president of public policy at the
DaimlerChrysler Corporation, sees the problems in similar ways,
although he looks at health care costs through the lens of large
corporate employers.
General Motors, he says, is paying people to leave their jobs so
they can hire replacements at 50 cents on the dollar with reduced
health benefits. “It’s sad,” he says. “You have a giant albatross
around your neck because you choose to provide a good standard of
living for your employees.”
Money in Politics
If the current system is
so unpopular among medical professional, patients, and business
owners, what’s keeping it in place? Most advocates for single-payer
agree that money in politics is the greatest obstacle to change.
During the 2006 election cycle, the health care industry spent $99.7
million on campaign contributions. Lobbying on health care issues
topped $446 million in 2007.
For Jack Lohman, that’s the crux of the problem. “Both McCain’s and
Obama’s plans for health care are lousy,” he says. “Although both
claim they’re not taking lobbyist money, somehow this money is
getting through. They are each supporting health care that keeps the
insurance industry involved.”
And all that money can buy a lot of misinformation and
scaremongering. Rocky White says he finds that people get interested
in the single-payer approach if they understand what’s actually
being proposed: “When people realize that all that it is,” he says,
“is a publicly owned insurance company, all of a sudden business
people start to lose that fear that ‘Oh my God, we’re going to
become the Soviet Union.’ Even Republicans say, ‘This really makes a
lot of sense.’”
While White would like to see reform happen on a national level, he
believes it’s more realistic to work at the state level for now. And
for him, that means Colorado. White sits on the board of Health Care
for All Colorado, a nonprofit, volunteer-run group with 250 members
that includes Democrats, Republicans, physicians, business people,
college professors, and economists. And he is running for a
Democratic seat in the state legislature to add “the voice of
medicine” to the debate.
“Any time a state has studied it, they find that single-payer is the
most cost-effective and covers everyone,” White says. His proposal
for a single-payer system in Colorado is being studied by a blue
ribbon commission created by the Colorado Legislature.
In May, the 6,000 delegates to the Colorado Democratic Party
Convention endorsed a pro-single-payer resolution that will be
forwarded to the national convention in Denver in August.
If one state can make a single-payer plan work, White believes, it
could start a cascading effect similar to what took place in Canada
during the 1940s and ‘50s.
“People are discouraged, they’re angry, they’re upset,” White says.
“But politics is the process that drives policy, and if we don’t get
involved in the political process we’ll never make a difference.”